<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Present IT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.presentit.se/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.presentit.se</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:09:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UK Budget Deficits</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/uk-budget-deficits</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/uk-budget-deficits#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 14:09:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=115</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[April&#8217;s fiscal stimulus is likely not about to happen following a budget deficit of 12.6% of GDP. This figure is far
higher than what was predicted by the Chancellor Alistair Darling. Darling announced that an 8% GDP rise in borrowing was expected over next year. This amounts to 118 billion pounds. As a result, the April [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>April&#8217;s fiscal stimulus is likely not about to happen following a budget deficit of 12.6% of GDP. This figure is far<br />
higher than what was predicted by the Chancellor Alistair Darling. Darling announced that an 8% GDP rise in borrowing was expected over next year. This amounts to 118 billion pounds. As a result, the April budget will have to be upgraded. Public finances are deteriorating rapidly and eating up on tax revenues and the surge in employment has also come about with a sharp increase in benefits payments. February experienced the biggest budget deficit on record that saw the public sector net borrowing amount to almost 9 billion pounds. This is 8 times higher than what it was a year ago. Credible forecasts will thus be needed in order to restore the health of public finances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/uk-budget-deficits/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Egg Pensions remain after the sale</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/egg-pensions-remain-after-the-sale</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/egg-pensions-remain-after-the-sale#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 14:09:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/egg-pensions-remain-after-the-sale</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite the internet bank Egg changing hands from Prudential to Citigroup, Citigroup intends to retain the
bank&#8217;s name but offer much wider range of services to its UK clients than what Prudential was previoulsy
able to offer. Citigroup claims that its experience in lending and its ideal credit histories will ensure
that Egg will become profitable in short [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite the internet bank Egg changing hands from Prudential to Citigroup, Citigroup intends to retain the<br />
bank&#8217;s name but offer much wider range of services to its UK clients than what Prudential was previoulsy<br />
able to offer. Citigroup claims that its experience in lending and its ideal credit histories will ensure<br />
that Egg will become profitable in short order. As part of the sale, Egg customers will continue to receive<br />
pensions and life assurance products from prudential for another 5 years after which Citigroup is expected to<br />
distribute life assurance products to parts of Asia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/egg-pensions-remain-after-the-sale/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comments from Warren Buffet</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/comments-from-warren-buffet</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/comments-from-warren-buffet#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The billionare investor Warren Buffet, who has huge investments in the banking and insurance industries, recently
said that the US economy has &#8216;fallen off a cliff.&#8217; Speaking on US cable network CNBC, Buffet said that the economy
has not only slowed down, but habits of the Americans have changed considerably. The 78-year old owner of the investment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The billionare investor Warren Buffet, who has huge investments in the banking and insurance industries, recently<br />
said that the US economy has &#8216;fallen off a cliff.&#8217; Speaking on US cable network CNBC, Buffet said that the economy<br />
has not only slowed down, but habits of the Americans have changed considerably. The 78-year old owner of the investment and insurance firm Berkshire Hathaway added that it is up to the US government to turn around the economy and reduce the effects of the recession. His long term view of the recession was however optimistic but warned that unemployment will rise further before the recession is over. “We’re in a big war,and we’re going to use money to fight it. ”Change won’t happen overnight, he concluded. “You can’t turn around on a dime.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/comments-from-warren-buffet/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulation is key to Capital Flows</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/regulation-is-key-to-capital-flows</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/regulation-is-key-to-capital-flows#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 14:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prior to the G20 meeting in London, POBC has released a series of articles on its opinion regarding the causes of the
current financial crisis. In one of the reports, POBC said that regulation has failed to keep up with new emerging
financial institutions, products and markets. The statement said that there is a lack of understanding [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prior to the G20 meeting in London, POBC has released a series of articles on its opinion regarding the causes of the<br />
current financial crisis. In one of the reports, POBC said that regulation has failed to keep up with new emerging<br />
financial institutions, products and markets. The statement said that there is a lack of understanding by regulators<br />
of the cross-border activities among internationally active financial institutions. &#8220;In particular, there is a lack of<br />
understanding of international capital flows,&#8221; the statement said. It thus called upon the International Monetary Fund<br />
to set up a warning system that would watch out for imbalances and destabilizations of international capital flows.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/regulation-is-key-to-capital-flows/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HSBC Rights issue</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/hsbc/hsbc-rights-issue</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/hsbc/hsbc-rights-issue#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 14:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[HSBC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HSBC plans to raise GBP12.5 billion to help bolster its capital cushion and fund acquisitions. This capital raising,
despite the negative news, is a positive one as it points to the bank&#8217;s significant strength and a new-found
confidence in the banking sector which has proven to be hugely significant. This capital raising will be a
rights issue to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HSBC plans to raise GBP12.5 billion to help bolster its capital cushion and fund acquisitions. This capital raising,<br />
despite the negative news, is a positive one as it points to the bank&#8217;s significant strength and a new-found<br />
confidence in the banking sector which has proven to be hugely significant. This capital raising will be a<br />
rights issue to its already existing shareholders and will not entail significant injections or assistance<br />
from banks as is the case with RBS and Llyods. This will be a plain old rights issue to its shareholders.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/hsbc/hsbc-rights-issue/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Citigroup buys Egg</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/citigroup-buys-egg</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/citigroup-buys-egg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citygroup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a move to possibly boost its revenue, Citigroup bought the internet bank Egg from the UK insurer Prudential
for only 75 million pounds. This is 375 million pounds less than the original value, or about 40% less value than that
assigned by Prudential just a year ago. The reason for the sale, according to Prudential was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a move to possibly boost its revenue, Citigroup bought the internet bank Egg from the UK insurer Prudential<br />
for only 75 million pounds. This is 375 million pounds less than the original value, or about 40% less value than that<br />
assigned by Prudential just a year ago. The reason for the sale, according to Prudential was growing losses for Egg.<br />
The bank was estimated to have lost 145 million pounds last year alone. The move was considered a good one by<br />
analysts as this was the best price on the market. According to experts, Prudential would have needed to infuse<br />
additional capital into Egg if it would have had to fetch a better price. However, this move would not have gone well with<br />
investors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/citigroup-buys-egg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Change in Citigroup hoped to stabilize the Bank</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/change-in-citigroup-hoped-to-stabilize-the-bank</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/change-in-citigroup-hoped-to-stabilize-the-bank#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 14:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citygroup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a bid to stabilize its postion and reassure the markets, Citigroup has agreed to have the Government
restructure its board of directors to include more independent members. Last year, in a bid to cut costs, the
bank slashed over 50,000 jobs and in January, Citigroup was split into 2 separate entities. These 2
businesses would help in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a bid to stabilize its postion and reassure the markets, Citigroup has agreed to have the Government<br />
restructure its board of directors to include more independent members. Last year, in a bid to cut costs, the<br />
bank slashed over 50,000 jobs and in January, Citigroup was split into 2 separate entities. These 2<br />
businesses would help in better management. Citicorp, one of the bodies, would continue to manage the<br />
traditional banking work of the company while the Citi Holdings business branch would specifically handle the investment assets of the firm that are considered the riskiest. Some of the stocks owned by the Government are to be<br />
converted to common shares.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/change-in-citigroup-hoped-to-stabilize-the-bank/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Government&#8217;s Stake in Citigroup increases</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/governments-stake-in-citigroup-increases</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/governments-stake-in-citigroup-increases#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citygroup]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US Government now has a 36% stake in the troubled Citigroup bank up from the previous 8%, the Treasury
announced earlier in March. The higher stake comes with more responsibilities as this will mean the US
Government will have a more powerful influence over the bank. However, the day-to-day operations and control
of the bank will still [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US Government now has a 36% stake in the troubled Citigroup bank up from the previous 8%, the Treasury<br />
announced earlier in March. The higher stake comes with more responsibilities as this will mean the US<br />
Government will have a more powerful influence over the bank. However, the day-to-day operations and control<br />
of the bank will still be handled by the Citigroup&#8217;s board. This move will help raise the bank&#8217;s private capital<br />
and still leave out extra taxpayer investment. Citigroup was one of the worst hit banks by the credit crunch.<br />
The bank was bailed out in a deal worth $45 billion by the US Government. The bank&#8217;s risky loans were also<br />
guaranteed with an extra $306 billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/citygroup/governments-stake-in-citigroup-increases/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Effects of Stocks on the British Inflation</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/effects-of-stocks-on-the-british-inflation</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/effects-of-stocks-on-the-british-inflation#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:00:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=98</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In Europe, the British stocks experienced a rise in february following the news on inflation that had also
caused the prices of food and fuel to go up. This has offset the deflationary effects of the economic crisis.
It was expected that consumer price index would drop as weaker demand would drive retailers to bring down
their prices [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe, the British stocks experienced a rise in february following the news on inflation that had also<br />
caused the prices of food and fuel to go up. This has offset the deflationary effects of the economic crisis.<br />
It was expected that consumer price index would drop as weaker demand would drive retailers to bring down<br />
their prices to attract more shoppers. However, the index rose from 3.0% in January to 3.2% in February.<br />
Commodity stocks have experienced heavy losses recently while markets across Asia continue to gain with<br />
Hong Kong and Japan&#8217;s indexes each experiencing a stunning 20% surge over the month of March.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/effects-of-stocks-on-the-british-inflation/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>No Incentive for Banks</title>
		<link>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/no-incentive-for-banks</link>
		<comments>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/no-incentive-for-banks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Shue</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.presentit.se/?p=96</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Banks have noted that more than 90% of all homeowners currently are on their mortgages. While they argue
that their assets will ultimately perform, the discounted prices being offered by investors do not
thus reflect the real worth of these investments. In addition, recognizing the assets at a lower value may
leave them worse off than if they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banks have noted that more than 90% of all homeowners currently are on their mortgages. While they argue<br />
that their assets will ultimately perform, the discounted prices being offered by investors do not<br />
thus reflect the real worth of these investments. In addition, recognizing the assets at a lower value may<br />
leave them worse off than if they do not sell out and make them potentially insolvent. Government-backed financing<br />
seems to be a sweetener but it is likely the banks will remain reluctant until they are offered a price that<br />
matches or exceeds the value recorded in their books. FDIC chairman, Sheila Bair however lamented that<br />
the banks will have to take the hit if they are to survive. There is no incentive for banks to participate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.presentit.se/uncategorized/no-incentive-for-banks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

